JUMP TO OBJECT NUMBER: FIVE : TEN : FIFTEEN: TWENTY: TWENTY-FIVE : THIRTY : THIRTY-FIVE : FORTY : FORTY-FIVE : FIFTY
|
INTRODUCTION
During the course of the year we will be looking back at how laboratory animal science has advanced since the Association was founded. First of all we would like to thank all the contributors who submitted their nominations for the list of objects that have changed the course and practice of animal research over the last five decades and to confirm that the contributors will all be acknowledged at the Winter Meeting (26th-28th November 2013). The items will be uploaded in batches to correspond with the publication dates of the LASA Forum so keep checking back for the next batch. The first two items have been selected to serve as an introcuction because they pre-date LASA’s foundation in 1963 so didn’t qualify for the final list of 50 objects but these were considered to have been too influential during LASA’s first 50 years to be ignored. |
Jeremy Bentham’s Head
This object obviously dates back much further than 50 years but some of the thoughts it held have certainly been embraced and come to the fore within that time, making it worthy of recognition. Bentham, of course, was the philosopher and social reformer who is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism. His most famous quote in relation to animal welfare dates back to 1789:
“The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?”
This was a ground-breaking concept for many at the time and it certainly took a while to catch on, but acceptance that animals can suffer, and that this matters, has become increasingly widespread over the last 50 years. For example, the 1997 European Treaty of Amsterdam desires to ‘ensure improved protection and respect for the welfare of animals as sentient beings’, and recitals to the new Directive 2010/63/EU emphasise that animals ‘should be treated as sentient creatures’ and mention the ‘capacity of animals to sense and express pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm’. Jeremy Bentham would surely have approved. Bentham requested that his skeleton (padded and dressed in his clothes) and head be preserved and displayed in a cabinet, which is housed at University College London to this day. However, the mummification of the head did not go well and the finished effect was somewhat disturbing, so the body was fitted with a wax replica and the real head relegated to a supporting role in the cabinet. Sadly, the great man’s genuine head fell victim to a number of student pranks including kidnapping for ransom, so it is now in secure storage, but you can still see his body with the wax version at UCL. To find out more visit the UCL Bentham Project |
Russell and Burch ‘The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique’
We know this also falls outside of the 50 year time frame in terms of its original publication, but it is such an on-going influence ...
The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique has had and continues to have a profound influence on the work of the animal research community. The inclusion of the philosophy of the 3Rs within the legislative framework is an obvious example, but of more importance is the cultural sea-change which has been evident during the past decades with scientists embracing these principles in their own right to the benefit of the experimental subjects and the science we conduct. With animal experimentation being largely conditional on the on-going support of the general public, the fact that we can point to the advances in the 3Rs is important evidence to assure the lay community of how seriously we approach this aspect of our work. For current practice the NC3Rs has adopted the following definitions:
”Replacement refers to methods that avoid or replace the use of animals defined as 'protected' under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (ASPA) in an area where they would otherwise have been used. ... Replacement methods can be absolute replacements - techniques which do not involve animals at any point, such as computer modelling, in vitro methodologies (e.g. tissue engineering), or human volunteers - or relative replacements, which avoid or replace the use of 'protected' animals.”
”Reduction refers to methods which minimise animal use and enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals or to obtain more information from the same number of animals, thereby reducing future use of animals.”
”Refinement refers to improvements to scientific procedures and husbandry which minimise actual or potential pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm and/or improve animal welfare in situations where the use of animals is unavoidable. It applies to the lifetime experience of the animal.”
|
| 50 OBJECTS |
JUMP TO OBJECT NUMBER: FIVE : TEN : FIFTEEN: TWENTY: TWENTY-FIVE : THIRTY : THIRTY-FIVE : FORTY : FORTY-FIVE : FIFTY
|
ONE |
Flexible Film Isolator
The Flexible Film Isolator was first reported by P.C. Trexler in 1963 (Lab. Anim. Care (1963), 13,572) as a system for control of contamination. The germ-free or gnotobiotic isolator was developed in centres such as the Laboratory Animals Centre for the rederivation and maintenance of pathogen free stocks of animals. The easy to manipulate PVC canopy enabled the rise of the disease free laboratory animal, drastically reducing the morbidity and mortality in laboratory animal experimentation and becoming the foundation stone of modern humane experimentation technique.
|

Photograph from the Laboratory Animals Centre's Gnotobiology Unit in 1973
|
TWO |
Polypropylene Mouse Box
The first replacement for the metal mouse cage was produced by North Kent Plastics Limited in the late 60’s, following some work with the Laboratory Animals Centre on the original mould. The M1 type with a flat top and space for a bottle and food hopper soon gave way to the M2 with a cut away front so that the animals could be observed more easily. This spawned many generations of improved, lighter enclosures for small laboratory animals which were easier to keep clean and environmentally more controlled; a major contribution to laboratory animal husbandry.
Photograph from the Laboratory Animals Centre's Gnotobiology Unit in 1973
|
|
THREE |
Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine was at the forefront of clinical analgesia in laboratory animal science: its duration of action and relatively limited adverse effects meant that for the first time effective post-surgical analgesia was possible in rodents. Its rapid uptake within the lab animal community was a credit to the profession and demonstrated the commitment of those involved to provide the best possible care for their animals.
Buprenorphine hydrochloride was first marketed in the 1980s by Reckitt & Colman (now Reckitt Benckiser) as an analgesic, generally available as Temgesic.
|
|
FOUR
|
The UFAW Handbook
The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals is now in its eighth edition, and has been a much turned-to fixture in many laboratories since its first edition in 1947. The second edition, in 1959, included eight pages on the animal house and 35 pages on laboratory equipment. Since then, the focus has shifted substantially and the Handbook has both kept up with and driven better understanding of, and attitudes towards, laboratory animals and their behaviour and welfare. For example, it recognised that cephalopods should have the same consideration as vertebrates by including them in the species covered long before they were included within the scope of the new EU Directive.
The eighth edition, published in 2010, places a strong emphasis on implementing the Three Rs and providing an appropriate environment for animals in the laboratory, as well as addressing best practice in the field. It also devotes chapters to topical issues such as welfare assessment, enrichment, positive reinforcement training (for animals) and competence and training (for humans). Judging by a quick look online at reviews of this volume, it is widely regarded as a ‘must-have’ for stimulating thought and better practice in relation to animal care and use.
|
|
|
Micromanipulators
A device used to handle tools under a microscope allowing manipulation of samples in situations where the human hand can’t achieve the level of precision needed unaided. Before the 1960’s micromanipulators could often only work in one plane at a time. Nowadays they allow precise and controlled movement, allowing for manipulations such as the injection of DNA into the pronucleus of an embryo, or microsurgery on a foetal brain. Without micromanipulators, the manipulation of laboratory animal embryos for the production of genetically altered animals would not be available, which are a mainstay of medical research.

|
SIX |
Microscopes
Microscopes are an invaluable tool today across a range of scientific fields and have opened the door to major discoveries in biology and medicine. Whilst the simple light microscope has been around for hundreds of years, it has evolved as our understanding of light and ability to produce high quality lenses has improved. It is with this cells were first seen and we started to understand more of our own world. As technology has advanced we have progressed in leaps and bounds. Phase Contrast microscopy received the Nobel Prize for physics in 1953, allowing us to examine transparent biological tissues without introducing artefacts from staining. The ability to look at live tissue and embryos has transformed medical research. Fluorescence microscopy was another discovery which made it possible to identify cells with high specificity, with yet more advances into our understanding of animals and ourselves opening up with the advent of Electron and confocal microscopy.
Microscope Figure 1 Figure 2
Images taken from the Wellcome Image awards, 2009-2012
Figure 1. 3D image of a developing embryonic mouse head at age 14.5 days. High-resolution episopic microscopy 3D reconstruction. Tim Mohun, National Institute for Medical Research, MRC. These images were created using high-resolution episcopic microscopy. Samples are embedded in plastic stained with a fluorescent dye. Each time a fine section of the sample is sliced away, an image of the remaining sample is captured. These images are then put together to create a 3D animation of the external and internal structure of the sample. from the point of view of developmental biology, this new tool can illustrate much more effectively the impact that certain mutations may have on the anatomy of the mouse embryo.
Figure 2 Confical microscopy image of Xenopus laevis oocytes, Vincent Pasque, University of Cambridge. Confocal and multiphoton microscopy are non-invasive fluorescent imaging techniques that use lasers of different wavelengths to excite the sample and produce the image. Samples can be detected simply from naturally occurring autofluorescence of the tissue or they can be labelled with fluorochromes to highlight specific tissues. |
SEVEN |
Liquid nitrogen storage tank/dry shipper
Pioneering advances in the cryopreservation area were carried out when fowl sperm was cryopreserved for the first time in 1949 by a team of scientists in the UK led by Dr Christopher Polge at NIMR. The process moved into the human world in the 1950s with pregnancies obtained after insemination with frozen sperm. The first calf derived from the transfer of frozen bovine embryos was reported by Ian Wilmut in Cambridge 1973, with technology gradually spreading to most laboratory animal species. All of this is possible because of our ability to store biological samples for indefinite periods at low temperatures. Cryogenic storage at liquid nitrogen temperatures (-196C) is presumed to provide an indefinite longevity to cells, although the actual shelf-life is rather difficult to prove. Estimates based on the accumulation of radiation-induced DNA damage during cryogenic storage period of 1000 years! Temperatures below the glass transition point of water (around -136C) appear to be accepted as the range where biological activity very substantially slows down, and -196C (liquid phase of nitrogen) is preferred temperature for the storage of important specimens.
The animal reproductive industry has been using liquid nitrogen (LN2) tanks to freeze and store frozen semen for several decades. More recently with the rapid development of embryo transfer technology in different species, it is being used for storing frozen embryos. LN2 tanks are a tool that farmers, artificial insemination technicians, embryo transfer practitioners, veterinarians, animal reproductive scientists, semen banks and researchers use every day. Most samples are stored in pressurised containers containing LN2. The development of non-pressurised vacuum-jacketed vessels similar to thermos flasks, has allowed the easy shipping of samples across the world, allowing sharing of biological samples. Shipping in these “dry shippers” is a safe and reliable way to maintain the storage temperature of the samples.
|
Fig 3 Fig 4 Fig 5 
Cryogenically stored sperm
Liquid Dewar flasks (Fig.3): They are non-pressurized, vacuum –jacketed vessels similar to a "thermos bottle". They come with a loose fitting cap or plug that helps to prevent air or moisture entering and also allows excess pressure to vent.
Liquid cylinders (Fig.4): They are pressurized containers specifically designed for cryogenic liquids. This type of container has valves for filling and dispensing the cryogenic liquid, and a pressure-control valve with a frangible (bursting) disk as backup protection. Three major types of liquid cylinders have been designed for dispensing either liquid or gas, gas only or liquid only.
Dry shippers, (Fig.5) are dewar flask containers designed for transportation of frozen biological specimens (semen or embryos) in LN2 vapour at temperatures around -190°C. They are made of lightweight aluminium and work by absorbing LN2 into a thick layer of hydro-phobic material that surrounds the inner cavity of the container where the semen is stored. The dry shippers must be properly charged by filling with LN2 to the point of saturation of the absorbing material and then removing the excess LN2 to provide maximum holding time. The long holding time of dry shippers is obtained because there is superior insulation created by a double-wall aluminium shell that is filled with foil and also vacuum sealed. |
EIGHT |
Controlled Rate Freezers (CRFs)
The biological metabolism of living cells dramatically diminishes at low temperatures, which permits the long-term preservation of living cells and tissues, storing them in a type of suspended animation. This has many applications in industry, medicine and scientific research, for example in the storage of food, blood for transfusion, Stem cells and tissue for research, or to store embryos and sperm of genetically altered animals. Material stored at -196 °C in the liquid phase of liquid nitrogen experiences no heat driven reactions and therefore virtually no decay or aging of the cells. The common problem however, is how to get the biological samples to that temperature without killing them. In 1963, Peter Mazur showed that lethal intracellular freezing could be avoided if cooling was slow enough to permit sufficient water to leave the cell during progressive freezing of the extracellular fluid, yet at the same time freezing needed to be fast enough to avoid the toxic effects caused by the long-term exposure to the cryoprotectants that protect biological samples from the cold. Controlled Rate Freezers were the solution allowing the accurate, repeatable process of reducing temperature in accordance with a programmed protocol. The controlled-rate freezing procedure, originally suggested nearly 40 years ago by British scientist Professor David Pegg, was a breakthrough, and most IVF laboratories worldwide now use controlled-rate freezers slowing reliable storage of many tissue samples (e.g. bone marrow, semen, oocytes, botanical seeds, skin, ovarian tissue, heart valves, blood vessels, stem cells and other cell lines). The preservation of biological matter is crucial to research and medicine because increasing amounts of human and animal tissue need to be stored for cancer treatment, vaccine production, stem cell work, human fertility, medical reserach as well as in animal husbandry, botanical studies, aquaculture and seed and fungi banking in conservation.
|
|
NINE |
Genetically altered animals
1966 Mouse genetic code cracked – Robert Holley, Har Gobind Khorana, Marshall Nirenberg
1982 First transgenic mouse - team led by Richard Palmiter and Ralph Brinster
A transgenic animal is one which has been genetically altered, generally having either DNA added or altered, usually with a view to expressing an additional gene, or abolishing or modifying the expression of an existing gene. Currently over 95% of transgenic animals used in biomedical research are rodents, overwhelmingly mice. This is due in large part to the availability of an extensive battery of gene manipulation technologies, and to a variety of other considerations such as the extensive analysis of its completed genome sequence and its similarity to our own, the ability to perform physiologic and behavioural tests that can be extrapolated directly to human disease and the short reproduction cycle. Since the creation of the first genetically modified mouse in 1974, transgenic technology has been extended and refined to allow the generation of models carrying ever more sophisticated genetic changes, including the ability to introduce subtle, disease-associated mutations and the ability to control the timing and spatial nature of the genetic change in the adult mouse. More recently, technologies have been developed to enable the generation of similar models in other species, including pigs and sheep, and in particular the rat. These technical developments have been necessarily accompanied by a raft of advancements in support technologies such as cryopreservation, rederivation and artificial fertilisation which have enabled the optimal exploitation of transgenic technologies and associated husbandry.
Transgenic models have revolutionised the study of physiology and disease biology, and facilitated the identification of new drug targets through the correlation of alteration of specific gene function with disease-associated phenotype, thereby accelerating the identification of novel drug targets and allowing more effective treatments to be developed. Because of the similarity in physiology and gene function between humans and rodents, transgenic rodents can recapitulate aspects of human disease and have thus become an invaluable technology for disease modelling. As well as increasing the molecular and physiological understanding of the disease state, these models facilitate the development of more effective treatments by enabling the efficacy and safety of new drugs to be tested during their early development, allowing focus on only the most promising drug candidates and saving on subsequent animal usage during the later development phases. Furthermore, transgenic rodents may spare the use of ‘higher’ animals, for example the use of a transgenic rodent model expressing of the human version of a target gene as a means of testing drugs that interact specifically with the human and higher animal version of the target gene product.
In summary, the development of transgenic technologies in the 1970s and their extensive refinement over the following decades has meant that they currently represent one of the best approaches to understanding gene function in the context of disease susceptibility, progression and response to therapeutic intervention, and such models are playing an ever more vital role in the discovery and development of new treatments to address the major diseases which still afflict mankind.
Picture: Two NOD/SCID mice expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) under UV-illumination flanking one plain NOD/SCID mouse from the non-transgenic parental line.
|
|
Environmental enrichment
Environmental enrichment has been a hot topic in rodent research for more than 50 years with increasingly diverse applications. Inspired by famous neuropsychologist Donald O. Hebb's incidental finding that the rats he had kept as pets outperformed those from his laboratory in learning and memory tasks, scientists began to use environmental enrichment as an experimental variable to study developmental plasticity of brain and behaviour. The emerging insights into its effects on brain structure and function led directly to biomedical research on potential therapeutic effects of enrichment on neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Huntington's, Alzheimer's), aging, and recovery from stroke and other forms of brain damage. And in the early 90's, when scientists became aware that the overall well-being of most laboratory rodents may primarily depend on their housing conditions, it did not take long until environmental enrichment became a major subject also in laboratory rodent welfare research.
"Environmental enrichment for laboratory animals is important from both ethical and scientific standpoints. From the ethical standpoint, it imporves the wellbeing of the animal. Keeping animals in over restrictive sterile environments where it has been shown that they resort to abnormal behaviours should not be justified on either scientific or commercial grounds because care-givers are responsible for the welfare of animals in their charge"
UFAW Handbook

|
| ELEVEN |
The PCR machine
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, invented by Kary Mullis in the early 1980's is a quick and easy method for generating unlimited copies of a DNA fragment. Initially the chain-building reaction was carried out in a step-wise process in test tubes exposed to the various temperatures and enzymes required but later it was automated, aided by the discovery and use of the Taq DNA enzyme that is resistant to high temperatures. PCR has become an essential technology for the detection of infectious organisms and the study and detection of variation and mutation of genes in laboratory and clinical science. Within laboratory animal science it is vital for, the screening of infectious agents, health monitoring and the analysis and confirmation of genetically altered animals. |

PCR process
|
| TWELVE |
The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986
Legislative changes during the past 50 years have had a major influence on the conduct of laboratory animal science. Prior to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, research in the UK was carried out under the Cruelty to Animals Act 1876. The 1986 Act (ASPA) introduced the concept of harm/benefit analysis, placed the 3Rs at the forefront of studies, introduced 'named' individuals with clearly defined roles and responsibilities toward the use of their animals, put a sharper focus on laboratory animals' housing and environmental control and coupled this with a robust inspection scheme. This Act required scientists to justify the need for the use of animals in their research and the tight system of regulation gave the public greater confidence in this; this has been reinforced by the amendment of the Act in 2012 in line with the new European Directive.
The ASPA is there to protect laboratory animals but the Serious and Organised Crime and Police Act in 2005 was important in protecting the animal research community from harassment and intimidation from animal rights extremists, providing for more effective policing and protection of UK research. |
| THIRTEEN |
The training clicker and PRT
The last 50 years have seen growing efforts to understand and empathise with laboratory animals and use complementary techniques. An example is Positive Reinforcement Training (PRT), which often uses aids such as the clicker, to avoid the restraint of an animal for the administration of substances or the collection of biological samples. Restraint is now recognised as a significant stressor and one to be avoided if possible. Giving animals the opportunity to cooperate voluntarily can result in less stress on the animal and, because the physiological responses to stress are reduced or eliminated, provides for better science for the investigator.
The clicker is used to facilitate PRT by providing a 'bridge' between the desired behaviour and the reward (usually food). Although PRT is predominantly used with larger animals, its use is expanding to laboratory rodents and other species. For more information on PRT training visit the NC3Rs website |
| FOURTEEN |
Dolly the Sheep
Dolly was the first cloned animal to be created from an adult somatic cell. She was born on 5th July 1996 at the Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, and became a global front page story. The cell used as the donor for the cloning of Dolly was taken from a mammary gland and the production of a healthy clone showed that genes in the nucleus of such a mature differentiated somatic cell are still capable of reverting to an embryonic totipotent state, creating a cell that can then go on to develop into any part of an animal. During her relatively short life, she had 6 offspring but was euthanised in 2003 because of progressive lung disease and arthritis, not uncommon in older animals of her breed.
BBC Radio 4 'The Reunion' September 2012
|

On Dolly's name, Ian Wilmut, who led the Roslin team, stated "Dolly is derived from a mammary gland cell and we couldn't think of a more impressive pair of glands than Dolly Parton's".
|
| FIFTEEN |
The Individually Ventilated Cage (IVC)
Good laboratory animal science dictates that animals should be disease-free and of high health status, since existing pathogens can alter an animal's response and affect the outcome of research, and that high standards of animal welfare are maintained. Animals with altered immune status are particularly vulnerable to pathogens and are increasingly used in medical research. The development of IVCs, in which each cage is effectively a separate barrier unit preventing the transmission of pathogens between cages, allowed susceptible strains to be maintained in higher health, resulting in fewer numbers bred and used and significant refinement in their condition and welfare.
IVC cage and rack
|
| SIXTEEN |
The MRI scanner
Traditional methods of investigating human disease in animal models often involve invasive sampling and measurement of body fluids and tissues that require handling and restraint (which can be distressing for laboratory animals), after which the animals may be sacrificed for further analysis. However, technological advances are making non-invasive imaging techniques increasingly available as practical alternatives to traditional procedures. A variety of techniques can provide images of body systems (e.g. organs, tumours, molecular pathways) with varying degrees of accuracy and permit the refinement, reduction or replacement of the use of animals in experiments. For example, imaging techniques allow serial studies on the same animal, so reducing inter-animal variation and thus the overall number of animals needed to achieve statistical significance. Because diseases and responses to exogenous substances can be monitored in a temporal and spatial manner, a greater amount of data can be obtained from small numbers of animals and there is no need for invasive surgery and/or serial sacrifice. Non-invasive imaging techniques can also enable more meaningful and humane endpoints to be used, e.g. by allowing early detection of cancerous cells and provide translational information between the animal model and the clinical manifestation of a disease.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology is used to distinguish pathologic tissue (such as a brain tumor) from normal tissue. One advantage of an MRI scan is that it uses strong magnetic fields and non-ionizing electromagnetic fields in the radio frequency range, unlike CT scans and traditional X-rays, which both use ionizing radiation. The first patent for a MRI machine was submitted in 1972.
|

MRI scan of an anaesthetised rat
NC3Rs Information Portal
|
| SEVENTEEN |
The camera and video
The ability to capture an image in the laboratory has allowed the recording of specimens, monitoring processes of change, measurements and analyses, and provided the means to transfer and share this information. Within the laboratory animal science arena, video has enabled better animal monitoring, especially when coupled with behaviour analysis software, and the development of training materials to share good practice.
An example of the latter is the material produced by Newcastle University on techniques http://www.procedureswithcare.org.uk and the recognition, assessment and alleviation of pain in laboratory animals http://www.digires.co.uk |
 |
| EIGHTEEN |
Lab. diet
Fifty years ago, the National Research Council (NRC) published the first edition of 'Nutrient Requirements for Laboratory Animals', summarising the requirements for rats, mice, guinea pigs, hamsters, monkeys and cats. It is now well understood that nutrition has an important effect on the performance, evaluation and reproducibility of experimental animal research, as well as on understanding requirements for breeding.
By the 1970's the desire for sourcing consistent and stable diets for research studies was growing and the NRC published revised requirements. The American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) also recognised that experimental studies and the use of purified ingredients needed standardising and a committee formulated the first standard purified ingredient diet, 'AIN 76 Rodent Diet' in order to guide research.
In 1979, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) enforced regulations which demanded analysis and control of diet parameters - Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) was born. This meant diets being regularly analysed to identify nutrients and possible contaminants. In the 80's irradiated diets were introduced and the 90's saw the introduction of further regulations that increased standards beyond conventional diet manufacture legislation. |
| NINETEEN |
The knockout mouse
A knockout mouse is a genetically engineered mouse in which an existing gene has been inactivated, or "knocked out," by replacing it or disrupting it with an artificial piece of DNA. Knockout mice are important animal models for studying the role of genes which have been sequenced but whose functions have not been determined. By causing a specific gene to be inactive in the mouse, and observing any differences from normal behaviour or physiology, researchers can infer its probable function. The first recorded knockout mouse was created by Mario R. Capecchi, Martin Evans and Oliver Smithies in 1989, for which they were awarded the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
Examples of research in which knockout mice have been useful include studying and modelling different kinds of cancer, obesity, heart disease, diabetes, arthritis, substance abuse, anxiety, aging and Parkinson disease. Knockout mice also offer a biological context in which drugs and other therapies can be developed and tested.
Many of these mouse models are named after the gene that has been inactivated. For example, the p53 knockout mouse is named after the p53 gene, which codes for a protein that normally suppresses the growth of tumours by arresting cell division. Humans born with mutations that inactivate the p53 gene suffer from Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a condition that dramatically increases the risk of developing bone cancers, breast cancer and blood cancers at an early age. Other mouse models are named, often with creative flair, according to their physical characteristics or behaviours. For example, "Methuselah" is a knockout mouse model noted for longevity, while "Frantic" is a model useful for studying anxiety disorders. |
 |
| TWENTY |
Toys for dogs
In July 1997, Lord Williams, a Home Office Minister, indicated in a written reply to a Parliamentary Question that, 'The Inspectorate will audit all commercial dog facilities to identify best practice and innovations with respect to the housing and care of animals (dogs), and that this information will be used to inform national standards.' The survey encompassed 27 Designated Establishments and commercial breeders in the UK and its recommendations were published in 1998.
These included the necessity to house dogs in pairs or groups, unless there were persuasive scientific or welfare reasons against; the requirement for staff to be educated and trained in all aspects of dog welfare; staffing levels to be sufficient to provide significant human-animal interaction and socialisation programmes; and the need for the animals' environment to have complexity and choice, including the use of treats and toys, as well as high standards of cleanliness.
Research Animals Department, RSPCA (10/2005), Supplementary resources for lay members of local ethical review processes: The dog: Good practice for housing and care, Horsham, RSPCA, pp 1-5 (155KB)
|
.jpg)
Image joint © Understanding Animal Research/Wellcome Images.
|
| TWENTY ONE |
The RSPCA Science Group
The RSPCA Science Group, established in 1976, is a centre of expertise which provides the scientific basis that helps enable the Society to advance animal welfare effectively. The research animals team is formed of specialist scientific staff who work with those involved in the regulation, care and use of animals in experiments, both nationally and internationally, to develop and promote practical measures that will help to: ensure critical assessment, on a case by case basis, of the necessity and justification for animal use; replace, or avoid, the use of animals; reduce the numbers used; refine experimental procedures, housing and care to improve welfare and to minimise and preferably avoid suffering.
There has been a long and effective collaboration between the RSPCA team and LASA throughout their existence.
http://www.rspca.org.uk/sciencegroup/researchanimals. |
| TWENTY TWO |
The whole-body plethysmograph
Whole-body plethysmography is used to measure respiratory parameters in conscious unrestrained subjects, including quantification of bronchoconstriction and bronchodilation. The plethysmograph has two chambers, each fitted with a pneumotachograph. The subject is placed in one of them (subject chamber) and the other remains empty (reference chamber). The pressure change is measured by a differential pressure transducer with one port exposed to the subject chamber and the other to the reference chamber.
A plethysmograph (such as the Buxco chamber shown) allows the measurement of respiratory function in conscious and unrestrained rodents, free from the effects of anaesthesia. It also enables the same animals to be studied on repeated occasions over long periods of time. This system has been widely used to develop novel therapies and the potential effects of substances on the respiratory system. Previously, such studies would have involved significant restraint or terminal anaesthesia and larger numbers of laboratory animals. |
|
| TWENTY THREE |
The 96-well plate ...
... then the 384 and 1536, and now the 3456 and 9600, microtitre plates. Microtitre plates are flat plates that support multiple 'wells' (small test tubes), arranged in a rectangular matrix that allow assays to be conducted with much smaller volumes than before and by automated processes. The earliest plate was developed in 1951 but, by the 1990's, numerous companies were producing these for multiple applications involving filtration, separation, optical detection, storage, reactions or cell culture. Their use has significantly reduced the volumes of biological samples required to be collected from laboratory animals for analysis or routine microbiological monitoring. Furthermore, commercially available plates for serology have permitted on-site health monitoring of research colonies, providing for more rapid identification of pathogens and resolution of problems. |
 |
| TWENTY FOUR |
The whirling hygrometer
Before the introduction of electronic sensors in computerised building management and monitoring systems, the humidity of animal holding rooms was measured with a whirling hygrometer, in which the instrument is fitted into a ratchet or 'football rattle' device that is whirled around in the air.
The correct environmental conditions for housing laboratory animal species are critical to their health and welfare and the outcome of the science for which they are used. In the UK, these conditions are prescribed in Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act Code of Practice for the care and accommodation of animals. Humidity is a key factor, recommended to be between 40 and 70 per cent for rodents. In rats, low humidity can result in ringtail, an epidermal disease in which the tail swells as a consequence of annular constrictions along its length (hence the name "ringtail") and subsequently dehydrates and sloughs; in the most severe cases, the process may end up in the tail becoming gangrenous and dropping off. Feet may also swell and redden. |
| TWENTY FIVE |
A jellyfish and its GFP
Green fluorescent protein (GFP) is a protein composed of 238 amino acid residues that exhibits bright green fluorescence when exposed to light in the blue to ultraviolet range. Although many other marine organisms have similar green fluorescent proteins, GFP traditionally refers to the protein first isolated from the jellyfish, Aequorea victoria in the 1960's. GFP was not utilised as a tool for molecular biology until 1992 but its importance was recognised in 2008 when Martin Chalfie, Osamu Shimomura, and Roger Y. Tsien were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for its discovery and development. The GFP gene is used as a reporter of expression; it can be introduced into an organism and maintained in their genome to tag a protein, thus cells in which the tagged protein is expressed will fluoresce. Transgenic GFP mice and other species are increasingly used in gene therapy and regenerative medicine research. |